business

3M and DuPont to Face Connecticut Firefighters' PFAS Lawsuit

Summarized from All News

A court ruled 3M and DuPont must face a lawsuit filed by Connecticut firefighters alleging harm from so-called forever chemicals.

Chemical giants 3M and DuPont have been ordered to face a lawsuit brought by Connecticut firefighters who allege they suffered health consequences from exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly known as PFAS or forever chemicals, a court has ruled.

PFAS compounds earned the nickname forever chemicals because they resist breaking down in the environment and in the human body. Firefighters have long raised concerns about exposure to these substances, which are found in aqueous film-forming foam — a firefighting agent widely used for decades at training exercises and emergency scenes.

Read more Dorset B&B Fights Airbnb's Bid to Own the Letters 'BnB' →

The litigation is part of a broader national wave of legal action targeting manufacturers over PFAS contamination. 3M and DuPont have both faced mounting legal and financial pressure in recent years related to their production and sale of PFAS-containing products, with prior settlements reached in some related cases.

The Connecticut case advances claims that the chemical makers knew or should have known about the potential dangers posed by their products and failed to adequately warn users, including professional firefighters who routinely encountered the substances on the job. Courts allowing such cases to proceed represents a continued legal exposure risk for both companies.

Continue reading at All News for the latest developments in this ongoing litigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.What are forever chemicals and why are firefighters concerned about them?

Forever chemicals, or PFAS, are per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances that resist breaking down in the environment and the human body. Firefighters have raised concerns because PFAS are found in aqueous film-forming foam widely used in training and emergency firefighting operations.

Q.What do the Connecticut firefighters allege against 3M and DuPont?

The firefighters allege they suffered health harm from PFAS exposure and claim the companies knew or should have known about the dangers but failed to adequately warn users of their products.

Q.Have 3M or DuPont settled other PFAS-related cases?

Yes, both 3M and DuPont have faced significant legal and financial pressure over PFAS and have reached settlements in some related cases, though the Connecticut firefighters' lawsuit will now proceed.

More in business →