Sam Altman Says Society Must Accept AI Harms for Its Benefits

OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said the world should be prepared to tolerate "bad things" — including hacks, scams, and other harms — as the price of realizing the broader benefits that artificial intelligence can deliver. The remarks, made in a recent interview, drew swift condemnation from critics who argue that major AI companies are too willing to externalize risk onto the public.

Altman made the case for a light regulatory touch, framing the trade-off as a necessary condition for unlocking what he called the "good stuff" that AI technology promises. His position aligns with a broader industry push to limit government oversight at a moment when calls for stricter AI accountability are intensifying in Washington and abroad.

Read more UK Leaseholders Await Relief as Labour Promises Fall Short →

The comments landed at a particularly sensitive moment for OpenAI. Over the weekend, a senior safety expert at the company resigned, publicly stating that OpenAI's internal "culture is broken." The back-to-back developments — a high-profile safety departure followed by the chief executive's apparent tolerance for foreseeable harms — amplified scrutiny of how the company balances innovation against responsibility.

Critics contend that framing societal damage as an acceptable cost normalizes harm and undermines efforts to establish meaningful safeguards before AI systems become more deeply embedded in critical infrastructure, financial systems, and daily life. Proponents of Altman's view argue that overly cautious regulation could stifle a technology they believe will generate enormous economic and social value.

The episode underscores an unresolved tension at the heart of AI governance: who bears the burden when powerful technologies cause harm, and how much risk is reasonable to impose on society in pursuit of innovation. Continue reading at Business | The Guardian.