policy

UK Creators Seek Share of AI and Device Revenue Worth £300M

Summarized from Business | The Guardian

A coalition of UK creators argues tech firms and device makers should pay for copyrighted work, potentially generating £300m annually.

UK Creators Seek Share of AI and Device Revenue Worth £300M

A group of UK creative industry advocates is calling on artificial intelligence companies and device manufacturers to compensate creators whose work underpins their products, arguing the practice could generate up to £300 million a year in additional income for Britain's creative sector.

The call comes in response to Anthropic's announcement that it would commit 5% of its shares to a fund for the public good. The advocates argue that before AI firms make such pledges, they should first ensure direct payment to the writers, artists, and other creators whose work was used to train their systems.

Read more Senior Ministers Back Burnham's EU Free Movement Debate Push →

Beyond AI companies, the letter's signatories point to device manufacturers as bearing a separate but related responsibility. Smartphones, computers, and similar hardware enable users to copy and store creative content, yet the United Kingdom has no private-copying payment scheme for creators — a gap that stands in contrast to more than 40 other countries that have established such compensation mechanisms.

The absence of a UK private-copying levy has long been a source of frustration among rights holders. Proponents argue that aligning British policy with international norms would not only provide a revenue stream for creators but also reflect the principle that those who generate value from creative work should share in the returns it produces.

Continue reading at Business | The Guardian

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.How much money could a UK creator payment scheme generate?

According to the letter's authors, a scheme requiring tech firms and device manufacturers to pay creators could raise up to £300 million a year in additional income for UK creators.

Q.Why are device manufacturers included in calls to pay creators?

The advocates argue that smartphones, computers, and other devices enable creative work to be copied and stored, meaning device makers benefit from that content and should share in compensating its creators.

Q.How does the UK compare to other countries on private-copying payments?

The UK currently has no private-copying payment scheme for creators, while more than 40 other countries have established such compensation mechanisms for rights holders.

More in policy →